User blog comment:The Kaufman/Germanic challenge - Voting!/@comment-2040889-20150920130722

Having amended my vote, this is the one valid as of 20/09/15:

-2 on Wexalian: the grammar is a bit too absurd for a Germanic language, especially for a magical teleporting fairy one that derives from Old High German in the Netherlands.

-1 on Karahien: same reason as before, though it's more blatantly wrong. There's not much to learn from this lesson. 1.5/10 since I had to review it again as a matter of fact.

Old vote:

-1 on Swamp Gothic: I don't quite like it; it really rubs me the wrong way, looks very much like more of a substitution with a very short list of changes that do not always make sense (uN > ỹ?) and that are not possible at the point in time when they take place ("{o a} {ō ā} > o a" followed by "a ā > o a" later on, to name an example), absolutely no vowel reduction and in general very few changes at all despite root-initial stress even up until the late 19th/early 20th century... I don't know, seems very much suboptimal.

-2 on Karahien: the tables are abhorrent, the sound changes are absurd, nonsense syntax. 2/10 wouldn't review again.