User blog:Elector Dark/A New Bureaucracy - Voting

So, ever since the incident with Zelos, we're lacking bureaucrats on the wiki. I don't really like it, and we'd really need them to function.

This will, then, be a new voting. My idea is to structure it like the previous vote, as to have it democratic. The rules are the same as before, except where modified appropriately:


 * 1) Only admins can be nominated, but regular users can nominate only one person; admins can nominate one more admin in addition to themselves.
 * 2) Anyone can vote. Every vote is worth one point.
 * 2.1) Non-nominated people have one pro vote and one con vote.
 * 2.2) Nominated people have one pro vote on everyone but themselves, and one con vote on themselves.
 * 3) Votes and nominations should be elaborated with a comment.

Current nominations and nominators:


 * Elector Dark (nominator: himself)
 *  Pá mamūnám ontā́ bán  (nominator: himself)

Current tally:


 * Elector Dark ( 0 )
 * Pros :
 * Cons :


 *  Pá mamūnám ontā́ bán  ( 0 )
 * Pros :
 * Fauxlosophe: I'll throw in a vote for Pá mamúmám ontá bán. From my limited experience, I feel like he's a bit more of a moderate voice which is good to have on the top of the pyramid. Honestly, it's a little arbitrary as I don't know either admin too well, but I just want to see this vote started so we can get on with the ressurrection. (30/10/2012)
 * Cons :