User talk:Jenburton

Vandalisation?
I have two questions considering all of this.

1: How can it be vandalisation if a guy removes what he has made, it is his creation and he is free to do as he please?

2: How come you wikia admins all of a sudden pop up around here after having done nothing for YEARS?

The Emperor Zelos 05:15, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Manners, Zelos, and watch the tone. kyām dēkәr 06:47, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, considering it's his page and he no longer wants the content on here why should he not be free to delete it? pá mamūnám ontā́ bán 07:46, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Well if this is about the message on my Gastish page, I never deleted, or at least intended to delete anything. Now I am very tempted to remove it =) OlykoekSlayer 23:15, May 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * All contributions made to Wikia are done so under the terms of the CC-BY-SA license the terms of which state, in part, "...all users contributing to Wikia projects agree to grant broad permissions to the general public to re-distribute and re-use their contributions freely for any purpose including commercial use. Such use is allowed where attribution is given and the same freedom to re-use and re-distribute applies to any derivative works. By editing Wikia, you agree to license any text you add under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License 3.0 (Unported)." Because you've contributed to Wikia and have, in doing so, granted us the permission to display the content you've created here removing content because you're moving to another host it is considered vandalism. Jen Burton (help forum | blog) 18:34, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * The code for the page is available in its history so if anyone should want it they can go there. Deleting the content doesn't wipe it from existence. Flag of Kihāmát (1957-).png pá mamūnám ontā́ bán 19:33, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Are you fucking kidding me? If the pages remain here but are inactive then it's only fair to allow a link to an active and more current article. You're being ridiculous. pá mamūnám ontā́ bán 19:29, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Sure, I understand if other users are allowed to redistribute and reuse any submitted information, but is that really good when the work is fallacious and/or out of date? Also, I am impressed how you manage to find wikis like this with relatively quick speed. OlykoekSlayer 01:11, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

That is not vandalism under any sense of the word.

Noun
vandalism (countable and uncountable; plural vandalisms)

Willful damage or destruction of any property with no other purpose than damage or destruction of said property.

Considering NOTHING here is done to WILLFULLY damage ANYTHING but rather show where BETTER things are, aka a SOURCE, it is NOT vandalism.

But I must say Jen, thank you for showing the true nature of wikia. You have done splendid and this is all recorded. The Emperor Zelos 14:37, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Hear, hear! pá mamūnám ontā́ bán 15:51, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

For how long will it remain recorded Zelos, for how long...? kyām dēkәr 16:05, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Unless Wikia deletes it all, forever The Emperor Zelos 16:58, June 2, 2012 (UTC)