Talk:H'snme

Syllable construction
Wordplacement dependence? DId you by any chance get the idea from rostov or was you the source he got it from?

It is highly unnatural that the placement in the word decieds wether or not a constriction applies or not, while at certain positions it might be more or less likely I doubt it would in any real language decied it

The Emperor Zelos 07:30, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

I took the idea from Ithkuil. If I don't miss my count, there is a language that has position-dependant syllable structures and is natural. Bluegamma 12:35, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

I would like to see it because so far I have never seen such, but it depends on what you are after. Natural you should say away from it, if its just fun and giggles it doesnt matter if you have it. though to me it would seem illogical because if you make a compound word like EVERY language has the system is instantly trashed

The Emperor Zelos Something

You might have a point. I'll redo it. Bluegamma 15:33, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

another thing, why is it that the syllable contain 2 vowels? the vowel is the core of a syllable so it should only be one and then the syllable goes around it The Emperor Zelos 16:57, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

That's accidental. I meant it to be approximant or vowel.

KSL
you know, that many numbers makes your conlang look KSLy

The Emperor Zelos 04:54, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

I know what I'm doing. I took into account language evolution and agglutination and such crap - Reichkommisar - (Ostland) - 13:15, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

PS: Look at Amatharic. Found it by random. It has an additional mass number. - Reichkommisar - (Ostland) - 13:20, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

so?

No real language have that many numbers, as far as I remember none has gone beyond trial as number and barely even makes that but suit yourself I was trying to help The Emperor Zelos 17:02, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

It can be an unique feature; Icelandic had an R- and W-umlaut :P - Reichkommisar - (Ostland) - 18:18, April 23, 2011 (UTC)