User blog comment:Scorpjke/I am creating a language which does not have a name yet :D/@comment-7965508-20130409175811/@comment-2040889-20130410224659

Esperanto, for one, has some irregular -n formations: "paŝon post paŝo" when the expected form is "paŝo post paŝo", then "anstataŭ" vs. the newly coined "anstataŭn"; there's also a truncation of roots that end in -cio ("abolicio" > "aboli", "navigacio" > "navigi", "federacio" > "federi") or prepositions concatenated into adverbs. Esperanto has a lot of opaque (that is, non-transparent) forms, such as "writer" being seperate from "write", whilst "builder" and "build" are connected