Blor

Babbling and slightly demented examples:
 * Bler blor blʌr. – the Blor speaker speaks Blor (by speaking Blor).
 * Leɣ loiɣ lʌiɣu loɣal louɣu. – The light bearer enlighted the enlighted area with light from a light source.

Blor is the babbling language.

General information
Blor has no history except in my brain. There are various hypotheses why it emerged there:
 * 1) it is a certain kind of nerd dementia praecox that in time results in the nerd hacking in  on a mediawiki media wiki wikiwiki,
 * 2) it is a  that enslaves large parts of the humanity in an  where they're (we're) being exploited and living in eternal poverty and misery,
 * 3) I just felt for it.

Blor is an experimental engelan that is concentrated not on grammar, which seems to be the usual conlangers interest, but on orthogonal word formation, perhaps something like polysynthesis, and on strictly distinguishing between the world-thought relational perspectives:
 * das ding in sich short ding, the item in the world that I refer to,
 * appearance, the inner image of the ding as presented in the vision center of the brain,
 * conception, the conception/imagination of or expectation from a ding, as dictated by private experience or information that have been provided to me, combined with intelligence and intuition,
 * label, conventional name or phrase for the ding, used for speach,
 * relations between these four.

Inspirations
Inspirations (in disorder):
 * Ithkuil/Ilaksh
 * IUPAC chemical terminology, Binomial nomenclature
 * Polysynthetic languages, Germanic languages, modern French, religious scripture Sanskrit
 * Triliteral root languages
 * Bantu languages
 * Chinese

Philosophy and rationale
I don't exactly know why I'm wasting my time with this stuff, except a vague hunch that I need to break the limits of my languages, (native) and  (secondary), and find some generic notation of semantics. The language Blor is an experiment that has been ongoing in my brain for some years, except I didn't know how to name it.

Non-goals
I have the following non-goals:
 * If I'll write a fantasy/scifi book, I won't use Blor for that, but something more like a hybrid of and the ugliest natural languages to be found on planet Earth (excepting English: too bad!).
 * I'm not producing an international auxiliary language – most are fundamentally unusable except as for pidgin usage. The grand successful international auxiliary language don't exactly require to be replaced – it is weird enough to deserve my admiration, although its long words makes it overly talkative.
 * I'm not aiming towards something democratic: "every stupid fool should be able to learn it", a few fools may actually want to (sorry for them), most may not, but it's not going to be a survival issue for any of us.
 * It's not going to be beautiful and/or "natural" – "naturalness" is the linguists' general admiration of crippled languages, I prefer the weird unnaturalness of Esperanto, before the "natural" sucker language par excellence, the language that proudly exclaims:
 * "Look here! No grammar, no word formation!" (nothing to be proud about)


 * I won't satisfy Noam Chomsky's desire for the language being "linguistic", I'm not a language analyser, I'm a language user. If Chomsky have nothing to analyse, it is of no consequence at all.
 * No ease of pronunciation, but neither making the language excessively hard to hear correctly – the phonology may be extensive, but not unnaturally so.

Perhaps-goals
My goals are, perhaps:
 * Word formation rules, and  being my favourites, word root composition will be so designed so that most root compounds have just one syllable per root, in order to allow for very long compositions, c.f. tripotassiumhexanitrocoboltate (K3Co(NO)6), which might become something analogous to "tri-ptas-hex-nirt-cpalt-at"; even though non-nerds will refuse to ever use such constructs, Blor is primarily directed towards mapping the needs of scientists, who are all nerds. Those who dislike it may instead opt to use the intauxlan of utter simplicity:  – a language of only seven allowed syllables, say  tripotassiumhexanitrocoboltate in Solresol and I'll eat my underwear!!
 * I will sometimes sacrifice simplicity for brevity, such that a certain root have a default number/case, then the number/case endings are (normally) dropped – except when speaker decides that clarity is essential.
 * Experiment with philosophical ontological and epistemiological models of objects, images, imaginations, and relations between them.
 * Experiment with various equality rules, such as default noun-pronoun equalities, try around with Japanese wa-ga analogues for regulating thema-rema.
 * I may dive deeply in pragmatics.
 * I'll decidedly respect neurophysiological rules of comprehensibility, not creating a language requiring some 10 words in the short-term memory to comprehend a sentence, few long dependencies, avoidance of embedded subclauses, avoidance of initial vagueness of speach.
 * The main side product is expected to be a semantic notation.

Phonology
Word roots follow the pattern:

[Consonant cluster][Vocal][Liquid] = [C][V][L]

The initial consonant cluster and the liquid defines a general concept like in triliteral root languages (most notably: Arabic and Hebrew), and the vocal derives a precise meaning, the vocal either being a vowel or a diphtong.

Vowels
Ææ, Ʌʌ, Ɒɒ, Ɛɛ, Œœ, Ɐɐ, Ɔɔ, Ee, Øø, Əə, Oo, Ii, Yy, Ɨɨ, Uu

Liquids
β, ð, ɣ, ʕ, l, ɭ, m?, n, ɳ, ŋ?, r, ɺ, ʁ, z

Alphabet
IPA.

Numbers
There are three numbers in Blor:

Grammatical cases
Grammatical cases are cases which play a role in the sentence, not just as a specification to a noun phrase. The verb to some degree decides what cases are valid in a sentence. The verb also specifies the exact role for the noun with a certain case, so the meaning of cases are very generalized outside the context of a certain verb.