Board Thread:The Help Desk/@comment-3998736-20130725031933/@comment-3998736-20130725141953

1) I think even something lesser couldn't hurt. Maybe just make a "nominee" pool [Call it "Spotlighted Languages" or something like that maybe], which you [or a committee] can screen. Rules are simple; People nominate for presentation and completeness and No one can nominate themselves. A Committee might be handy to delegate responsibility to dismissing languages that don't quite meet standards but have active contributors. In those cases, we'd do well to advise them and bring their pages up to par.

2) Subjectivity could fade if it was particularly low-balled. Somewhere where there's a decent sketch on grammar, maybe some vocab and gives you the feel of "I could probably write a little bit in this language". This could work with a nominee catagory though.

3) My main problem with it is that it's defined by the user rather than a 3rd party based off the wiki pages. There's a bunch of languages that boast high completion status but have nothing on the wiki to back up these claims.