Forum:Conlang Featuring

Discuss which language to feature on the front page here.

Not sure how things work? Go here Honoured Languages

 Quai'op   won this June! Check the Archive if you want to see the discussion and votes for its contest.

''' of voting for September. '''

Everything cleaned even if the current winner doesnt show up to write whats needed to restart it all

Nominations:
NB: For all those obsessing about, complaining, talking about or referencing KSLs (Kitchen Sink Languages) go -> here.

For those who are interested, I found a list of sentences of which if you are able to translate them into your language's grammar and words. It's essentially in a state of completeness, click here.

''' of nominating for September. '''

Nomination Rules

 * 1) The language must have the banner translated or be in a stage where it can be done by anyone.
 * 2) Conlangs may be re-nominated for another go after having won when 3 months have passed.
 * 3) State the purpose of the conlang in the description.

Nominating
Adwan Mis Hio Angy
 * Well, this is one of my favorites, and being probably one of the most complete languages, Adwan is a perfect candidate for featuring Rostov-na-don 10:38, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I hate elections with only one candidate to choose from ;) So here's another nomination. This is the language I have developed the most. Very complete, with lots of translated material, dictionary, its own script etc. It sounds nice, too. The structure of the language is somewhat unusual (to say the least); once you get it, however, it feels very natural. Adagio burner 14:03, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's certainly a work in progress, but I've made some headway with it. It's a theoretical auxlang for English, Spanish, and Chinese. Just looking for some constructive criticism. Razlem 22:55, December 3, 2010 (UTC)

Voting Rules
To make things clear, you can start voting before the 21st and until the last day (28th) change the votings whenever your heart so pleases. You will vote con or pro for a language, you don't have to do both, if you think it has only con then you vote con and describe why its con or pro. The rules will be these thought:
 * 1) Self voting does not count to the total (There are far too few of us to dilute the effect).
 * 2) Pro vote on oneself is a self vote
 * 3) Con vote on everyone else is self vote
 * 4) You may vote cons on all but one as a non-nominee, as nominee it is all but two. Pro votes may go to all but ones own conlang.
 * 5) Unregistered voters may not vote, but are still welcome to post comments and such.
 * 6) Newly registered people may not vote for 3 weeks and must be working on a conlang of some sort
 * 7) Try voting what you think looks best in accordance to these criterias.
 * 8) Realistic: Does the language look as if it could be spoken, written, listened to and read understandably?
 * 9) Goal: Does it reach the goal it is meant to fullfill, if it intends being universal judge it in accordance, if it tries being natural judge it in accordance.
 * 10) Completeness: How close is it to completion?
 * 11) Bots (ZeBot) cannot vote at all.

Voting

 * Adwan

Count:
Adwan: 0