La"n'u wa"ka:

Consonants
Symbols to the right of a cell are voiced. All symbols are per the X-SAMPA phonetic alphabet. Many phonemes can be pronounced differently for easier pronunciation if need be. [n], [t], and [d] can be be made dental, [f] and [v] can be made bilabial, [N] and [x] can be made palatal or uvular, [ks] and [gz] can be [kS] and [gZ], [K] can be a voiced or unvoiced dental fricative, [l] can be made velar (like it is sometimes in English - [L\] or [5]), [S] and [Z] can be made retroflex, and [r] can be made uvular, or it can be made into an alveolar or retroflex voiced approximant ([r\] or [r\`]).

Vowels
Symbols to the right of a cell are rounded. All symbols are per the X-SAMPA phonetic alphabet. [i] can be made near-high instead of high [I], [a] can be made near-low instead of low [{], or low back, rounded or surrounded, instead of low front ([A] or [Q]), [e] or [E] can be pronounced as a mid vowel [@], but not both, [o] can be made low-mid (rounded or unrounded) instead of high-mid ([O] or [V]), and [u] and [o] can be unrounded ([M] and [7]).

Writing System
This is the preferred way of writing if no IPA keyboard is present. If it is, the IPA is preferred over this one. If "c" is used for [ts], it cannot be used for [tS], and vice versa. If "j" is used for [j], then it cannot be used for [dZ], and vice versa. If no IPA keyboard is present, the X-SAMPA phonetic alphabet can be used, but the above system is preferred.

Structure of a Word
Words in la"n'u wa"ka: are made of two parts: the root can the suffix. Without a root, the suffix is a loose stem without substance, and without the suffix, the root has no actual meaning. Take the name of this conlang for example. The first word, la"n'u, is made of two parts. The first part, la"n', is the root, whose meaning revolves around language, and the second is the suffix, u, which indicates what type of noun the root is. Since it is u, it means the word is a verbal noun: language, so la"n'u means: language.

How to Express Things Other Than Nouns
la"n'u wa"ka: is a language composed entirely of nouns. There are no verbs or adjectives inherently; there are only three types of nouns that can be used to indicate verbs, adjectives, adverbs, etc. First, there is the verbal noun. This is the most common noun. This is most nouns in general, things like soap, water, car, baseball, dream, word. The second kind are what I call participants. They are basically the person doing the thing. For example, you can have a conlang; that would be the verbal noun, but a conlanger is the participant. "Life" is the verbal noun, but a "being" (something that lives), is the participant. A writing is the verbal noun, but a writer is the participant. Finally, there is the process of something. This noun seems odd, but it is really only used to express verbs and adjectives. There is the writing and the writer, but the process is the process of writing as a whole. You can have a market (verbal noun), a market-er (someone who goes to market: the participant), but the process of marketing is the process.

There is only one verb in this conlang, but it is somewhat invisible. It is in all words inherently but is not written. Here's how: if you want to say: "I am a writer", you just say: "I writer"; the "am" is interpreted through the context. The same applies to "I am cool"; you just say, "I cool". But, if you wanted to express other tenses besides the infinitive, like "I was cool", you would say "I cool", but would inflect the word "cool" into the past tense. This is because all words can be inflected for tense: it is inherent. It is just that the infinitive, which is the most common tense, is invisible. Inflections for tense (which can get quite elaborate like the are in English), can be applied to any word at all.

Verbs are expressed by saying that one "is the process of something". If you want to say, "I run", you say, "I am the process of run". If you want to say, "I could have ran", you say, "I am the process of run", reflecting the word "process of run" for conditional past perfect tense, making it: "I could have been the process of run", or "I could have been the process of running".

Adjectives are expressed by saying one is "of the process of something". Similar to the way verbs are expressed, but adding the conjunction "of". If you want to say, "I am cool", you say, "I am of the process of coolness", or "I am of the process of cool".