User blog comment:Meuser2/Community Conlang/@comment-28303871-20141116040536/@comment-202.63.46.215-20141116042730

OK. I was a little worried about this conflicting with the challenge, although I eventually decided to go ahead. I am happy to help you with the community conlang if you would like (I shall cancel this one, as the instructions are too complex). The above essentially states the following (though it may need much overhaul to work):

1. A section is opened for voting e.g. phonology.

2. Full phonologies (or whatever is relevant) are submitted.

3. Every phonology in which a phoneme appears counts as a 'vote' for that phoneme. Phonemes with too few votes are discarded.

4. The remaining phonemes are proposed to the community. Voters can vote to have a phoneme removed if they dislike it, or included if they absolutely love it (phonemes are included by default, so no vote is necessary to state moderate enjoyment).

5. After voting for phonemes closes, a vote is added to the number at stage 3 for every pre-vote, and subtracted for every con-vote.

6. Phonemes with too few votes at this stage are discarded, and the final phonology is proposed. Any inconsistencies (unlikely with phonology, but other sections may have such things) are noted, and if they are considered to be legitimate problems, they are cleared up. Step 1 is repeated for the next section.

I hope this helps explain, though it may still be difficult. It may very well be excessive, and entirely ignoring it may be the best option. What system did you have in mind?