User blog comment:Akvii/Natlang vs. Conlang Discussion/@comment-1355223-20100426001939

There are many little problems and issues with esperanto that are just plain un-logical (is that even a word or is it illogical?) as well derivation issues. Just check zompists criticism of esperanto nd there is also another document on Ardelambion whihc brings to light some of these problems. I have read a few books on esperanto (before i sold them xD) and found a few things i didnt like or thought were strange. But ersperanto is not a fully "perfect" language, and even if it was i dont belive it would remain so esperanto is meant to be an Auxlang and with the amount of speakers of different nationalities there would be at least some importing of their own cultural beliefs or their own language systems maybe which would eventually "corrupt" esperanto just like this happens with many other language, especially english which can be seen in not only the extensive change from old english to middle to now modern but also our huge importing of foriegn words like televsion (french) and karaoke(japanese) just to name two examples.

I think this hasnt happened to quecha (at least no where near to the extent it has with other language i.e english) because of its isolation and the few number of speakers (and also because it is not considered a main language of any nation/country) but, and prove me wrong if i am, i believed that though it might be nearly perfect it wasnt wholly so and it had undergone some change. I also belive that if it were to be put in the position where it was a main language of a country/nation and to be taught in schools it would, as time went on, be changed dramatically due to globalisation and other such factors, as all languages are wont to do.