Awkaŋu/German

=Allgemeine Informationen=

Awkaŋu ist eine Substantiv-Sprache, d.h. es gibt weder Verben noch Adjektive, die sich grammatikalisch von Substantiven unterscheiden. Die Satz-Struktur kann beschrieben werden als SOV (Subjekt Objekt Verb), wobei das Verb eigentlich ein Substantiv ist. Durch seine Stellung im Satz wird jedoch deutlich, dass die Handlung, die dem Substantiv entspricht, gemeint ist. Das Wort "Essen" würde in der Verb-Position "essen" bedeuten.

Awkaŋu ist eine isolierende Sprache ohne Ausnahmen. Sobald the Grundregeln der Grammatik verstanden sind, sollte der oder die Lernende in der Lage sein, Sätze selbstständig zu bilden, da alles auf Logik basiert.

Es gibt kein Wort für "sein".

Des Weiteren können in Awkaŋu alle vom Kontext her offensichtlichen Wörter weggelassen werden ("Folgerung").

Es gibt keine Präpositionen; alle Partikel sind Postpositionen.

Es gibt kein grammatisches Geschlecht.

=Das Alphabet=

Es ist zu beachten, dass dies die romanisierte Form der Awkaŋu-Schrift ist.

Vokale

 * a = [a]
 * u = [u]
 * i = [i]
 * o = [ɔ]
 * e = [ɛ]
 * w = [w]

Diphthongs

 * ey = [ɛi]
 * ai = [aɪ̯]]
 * ou = [oʊ̯]]

Konsonanten

 * n = [n]
 * ŋ = [ŋ]
 * m = [m]
 * b = [b]
 * l = [l]
 * d = [d]
 * t = [t]
 * f = [f]
 * s = [s]
 * sh = [ʃ] / [ʒ] vor [d]
 * g = [g]
 * k = [k]
 * h = [h]
 * r = [ɺ]

=Verb Position=

In Awkaŋu gibt es keine Unterscheidung zwischen Substantiven und Verben (Verben werden ebenfalls wie Substantive behandelt).

Um dieses Problem zu lösen, wird in Awkaŋu Gebrauch von der sogenannten Verb-Position gemacht.

Wie oben bereits erwähnt, ist die Satzstruktur Subjekt-Objekt-Verb, wobei alle Teile eigentlich Substantive sind.

Daher entsricht ein Satz eher folgendem Schema:

Jeder Satz folgt diesem Schema (Ausnahme: Siehe Inversion).

Die Verb-Position ist jener Teil eines Satzes, der normalerweise am Schluss steht und an den kein Fall-Partikel angehängt ist. Substantive in der Verb-Position werden als die dem Substantiv entprechende Handlung verstanden. Das bedeutet auf der anderen Seite, dass jedes Substantiv, das nicht in der Verb-Position steht, immer als das Substantiv verstanden wird und niemals als die Handlung.

=The Cases=

Es gibt insgesamt 27 Fälle in Awkaŋu. Alle Fälle werden durch das Anhängen von Partikeln an den entsprechenden Teil eines Satzes gebildet.

Die Partikel bu wird nur verwendet, wenn ein Handlung stattfindet. Wenn das Subject des Satzes keine Handlung durchführt, dann wird stattdessen die Partikel sa verwendet.

Für Beispiele für die Verwendung der einzelnen Fall-Partikel, siehe den Beispielsätze-Abschnitt.

=Mood=

Awkaŋu is based on subjectivism. Every sentence is seen as a subjective opinion or description of the environment. It is agreed upon that there are no objective truths apart from those that are defined in the believe system of the Awkaŋus. These things have an influence on the grammar.

The mood particles always come last in a sentence.

The particle shiaiga for the objective mood is used to express universal truths.

Because a sentence is always expressing a personal opinion, formulations such as "I find" or "to like" are not used.

Pronunciation of m
The particle m is pronounced [m].

If the m comes right after a consonant, it is pronounced [am].

=Tense=

There are three tenses in Awkaŋu. The respective tense particles are always added at the end of the verb position, but always before the mood particle. Tense is only applied, if an actual (physical) action happens. Thus, not every sentence comes with a tense.

Present Tense
For the present tense, there is no modification. No tense particle in the verb position means that the tense is present tense.

Example:
 * Lou bu kula. (I eat)

Lou bu   kula. I  c.ERG eat 'I eat.'

Past Tense
The past tense particle is mi. Abbreviation: PAST

Example:
 * Lou bu kula mi. (I ate)

Lou bu   kula mi. I   c.ERG eat  PAST 'I ate.'

Future Tense
The future tense particle is lia. Abbreviation: FUT

Example:
 * Lou bu kula lia. (I will eat)

Lou bu   kula lia. I  c.ERG eat  FUT 'I will eat.'

=Word chains / Noun Groups=

In Awkaŋu words can be linked together without restrictions.

In such a chain of words, which can be called noun group, the very last word will be the base word.

The base word is the root of the whole noun group, it is the most important part.

All the words before the base word are called specificators. They describe the base word thus making it more specific.

Examples: Kali sa dida maku teshu.
 * This is a blue tree house.

Kali sa   dida maku teshu. This c.OBJ blue tree house 'This is a blue tree house.'

Tou bu maŋal nolo ea tam sa kula mi.
 * The man ate a nice black nut bread.

Tou bu   maŋal nolo  ea  tam   sa    kula mi. Man c.ERG nice  brown nut bread c.OBJ eat  PAST 'The man ate a nice brown nut bread.'

=Number=

In Awkaŋu there is no distinction between singular and plural.

A noun is usually treated as the plural, depending on the context.

For expressing a definite number of a noun, numbers are used.

There are no other numbers in Awkaŋu except the rough equivalent of 'thousand' or 'a whole lot', represented by mesha.

Examples: Lou bu ewi tam sa kula mi.
 * I ate two slices of bread.

Lou bu   ewi tam   sa    kula mi. I   c.ERG two bread c.OBJ eat  PAST 'I ate two slices of bread.'

Nui kawa dulin bosiwi sa ti diwa no.
 * Why didn't you take four flowers?

Nui kawa   dulin bosiwi sa    ti  diwa no. What c.FUNC four  flower c.OBJ not take QUE 'Why didn't you take four flowers?'

Wen bu saw kuka sa ewat na tili mi.
 * She hit her brother three times.

Wen bu        saw   kuka    sa    ewat  na     tili mi. She c.ERG NULL c.GEN brother c.OBJ three c.QUAN hit  PAST 'She hit her brother three times.'

Counting
For pure counting, a number system with base 5 is used. Examples should be best for explaining this.

If something is multiplied by 1, the 1 is omitted.

=Inversion=

In Awkaŋu, inversion is done by switching verb and object. As the verb is then no longer in the verb position, it has to get the verb particle ja attached to it to still be a verb.

Inversion is used, when the object is a more complex construction.

Instead of the object, other parts can be inversed as well, though it is not usual to inverse with the subject.

=The particle "ja"=

The particle ja is used to turn a noun into a verb.

But the acutal effect that this has on sentences can be huge.

Using ja means that an inversion happens most of the time.

As explained in the Inversion Section, this causes the things following the ja to be treated as the object of the sentence.

However, due to the fact that ja can be followed by an infinite number of words, the part after ja can be more than a simple object.

Compare these sentences:


 * 1. Lou bu kula ja tam sa.
 * 2. Lou bu wim ja ley bu kula.

Lou bu   kula ja    tam   sa. I  c.ERG eat  c.VER bread c.OBJ 'I eat bread.'

Lou bu   wim ja    ley bu    kula. I  c.ERG see c.VER you c.ERG eat 'I see you eating bread.' / 'I see, that you eat bread.'

In the 1. sentence there is really only the object tam(bread), it is a normal inversion.

In the 2. sentence however, there is a complete sentence following the ja. Technically, this whole thing could still be seen as an object, but it may be easier to understand this by translating the ja as "that' in such a case, as done in the translation of the 2. sentence.

=Questions=

Questions are made by adding the question particle no at the end of a sentence. By doing so, the sentence becomes a quesion. No further changes have to be made.

Example Note that there is no "?" in Awkaŋu. Instead, the no functions as that.
 * "Ley bu tam sa kula." becomes "Ley bu tam sa kula no."

As for intonation, there should be no difference between a statement and a question, i.e. the voice stays low in either case.

Abbreviation: QUE

Ley bu   tam   sa    kula no. You c.ERG bread c.OBJ eat  QUE 'Do you eat bread?'

=Inference=

As mentioned in the introduction, inference plays an important role in Awkaŋu. By inferring, so many words are omitted and so much time is saved. Inference shall be explained through a few example sentences.

Let's assume, John and Mary have an appointment. Mary is late, so when she arrives, John asks:


 * "Nui tai mi no."

Nui tai   mi   no. What c.LOC PAST QUE 'Where have you been?'

This means: "Where have you been?" As you may have noticed, there is no ley and no sa in that sentence. That is, because being entirely obvious from the context they are omitted. Without inference the sentence would be "Ley sa nui tai mi no.", which means exactly the same thing. Only the word for "you" is added.

Another example: You call a friend and say "What are you doing?"
 * "Nui sa ama no."

Nui sa    ama no. What c.OBJ do  QUE 'What are you doing?'

Again the ley sa (you) is omitted, because everyone knows who you are referring to. In colloquial language the sa may be dopped as well as the no to produce the sentence "Nui ama" that still means "What are you doing?".

Inference does not only work for questions though. You could say for instance: "Tam sa kula." ("I eat bread.") Here, the lou bu(I) is inferred.

Null Morpheme
In some cases of inference, it can happen that a case particle ends up isolated without any noun to refer to.

Many times, having the case particle refer to nothing involves two case particles following each other. This can lead to ambiguity if context is unclear.

In such a case, there is an invisible null morpheme in front of it. This doesn't effect the spoken language or the writing, but is useful for understanding some of the example sentences.

The null morpheme is abbreviated as 'NULL' in the examples.

=Feature Words=

Feature words can be treated as adjectives.

A feature is constructed by combining any group 1 word with any group 2 word.

Examples: Tam  sa    maŋal gwola. Bread c.OBJ good taste 'The bread tastes good.'
 * "Tam sa maŋal gwola" means "The bread tastes good" or "The bread is of good taste".

Maku sa bà ikat. Tree c.OBJ much height 'The tree is very high.'
 * "Maku sa bà ikat!" means "The tree is very high!".

The group 3 words can be added arbitrarily at the beginning of any feature construction. They can also be used for any other word and even for nouns.

Examples: Kali sa bilà maŋal.
 * This is good enough.

Kali sa   bilà   maŋal. This c.OBJ enough good 'This is good enough.'

Kali teshu sa kitsha àbu lum.
 * This house is too cold.

Kali teshu sa   kitsha àbu    lum. This house c.OBJ too   little temperature 'This house is too cold.'

Ti bilà kula mi no.
 * Didn't you eat enough?

Ti bilà   kula mi   no. Not enough eat  PAST QUE 'Didn't you eat enough?'

Nou we ama no.
 * Will you do it some time?

Nou we   ama no. Any c.TEM do  QUE 'Will you do it some time?'

=Reduplication=

In Awkaŋu there are two ways to express enlargement or an augmentative.

One has been explained in the Feature Words Section.

The other is even simpler, but is used less frequently.

To really emphasize the huge size, extent or amount of something, one can simply use reduplication of words.

Repeating a word accomplishes emphasis.

Note, that the effect of reduplication is way larger than that of using ba. Therefore use it with causion.

Example: Wen saw ata bu tam tam sa kula.
 * Her friend eats tons of bread.

Wen saw  ata    bu    tam   tam   sa    kula. She c.GEN friend c.ERG bread bread c.OBJ eat 'Her friend eats tons of bread.'

Lou bu kali ma dami dami lia ja ley sa ìta ben.
 * I will think deeply about this before I call you.

Lou bu   kali ma    dami  dami  lia ja    ley sa    ìta  ben. I  c.ERG this c.OBL think think FUT c.VER you c.OBJ call c.ANT 'I will think deeply about this before I call you.'

=Pronouns=

Apart from the personal pronouns, there are only four other pronouns in Awkaŋu. Two of them are demonstrative pronouns while the third is used to express uniqueness.

The pronoun kana is interesting. It can be used in two ways. The first way corresponds to the english use of it or that in a sentence like "He showed me the picture and I liked it". So instead of repeating the word picture the pronoun kana would be used. This works only, if it is clear from the context wheather the subject or the object is referred to as kana. In a case in which this is unclear, the respective word or part of the sentence is marked by nuru beforehand.

Examples: Nuru tou bu tam sa kula tsho kana bu lok.
 * He eats a bread and falls down.

Nuru    tou bu    tam   sa    kula tsho kana bu    lok. This one he c.ERG bread c.OBJ eat  and  it   c.ERG fall 'He eats a bread and falls down.'

Tou bu nuru tam sa kula tsho kana bu lok.
 * He eats a bread and it falls down.

Tou bu   nuru     tam   sa    kula tsho kana bu    lok. He c.ERG this one bread c.OBJ eat  and  it   c.ERG fall 'He eats a bread and it falls down.'

Kana can also be used to refer to a whole sentence. Again, context is important.

=Relative Clauses=

Even though relative clauses are treated as a case in Awkaŋu, their use is not always easy. The relative particle is ye.

Some of these sentences are quite advanced. Don't bother understanding them completely before the other grammar points, because they make use of multiple grammar rules at once.

Lou bu   wim ja    ye    àlweal bu    lomì  sa    tiwon. I  c.ERG see c.VER c.REL master c.ERG pupil c.OBJ kill 'The master, that I see, kills the pupil.' Lomì sa    tiwon mi   ye    àlweal bu    tam   sa    kula. Pupil c.OBJ kill PAST c.REL master c.ERG bread c.OBJ eat 'The master, that killed the pupil, eats a bread.' Kìwe tiwon ye   àlweal sa    kula ja    lomì  bu. self kill c.REL master c.OBJ eat  c.VER pupil c.ERG 'The master, that killed himself, is eaten by the pupil.' Tam  sa    kula ye    àlweal bu    tsho lomì  sa    kula. Bread c.OBJ eat c.REL master c.ERG and  pupil c.OBJ eat 'The master, that eats a bread, eats the pupil as well.'

Note that in every relative clause with ye, there is one thing you have to look out for. If there is an object (objective case) anywhere in the ye-clause, this always means that the word after ye is the agent (ergative case).

If there is no object in the ye-clause, this always means that the word after ye is the object.

Keep these rules in mind, since they have to be followed in every case.

Alternative ways to construct relative clauses
The construction with ye is the standart way of constructing a relative clause, and it is the one that won't cause ambiguity no matter what.

However, there are other ways as well, that should be mentioned.

One other method is basically just paraphrasing.

In the ye-form it would look as follows.
 * The sentence 'What you did was bad.' is a case, in which you can either use ye or paraphrase the sentence.

Ley ama ye sa gwe mi.

Ley ama mi  ye    sa    gwe mi. You do  PAST c.REL c.OBJ bad PAST 'What you did was bad.'

Note, that there is no word following the ye but only another case particle. This can be done in some cases.

Using paraphrasing, the sentence would be:

Ley ama  sa    gwe mi. You doing c.OBJ bad PAST 'What you did was bad.' literally: 'Your doing was bad.'

This makes use of a word chain.

It is also possible to use saw (Genitive) to do the paraphrasing.

Ley saw  ama   sa    gwe mi. You c.GEN doing c.OBJ bad PAST 'Your doing was bad.'

The use of saw is less ambiguous in many cases.

=Opposites with "mu"=

The particle mu can be used to turn any word into it's opposite. This applies to particles, too.

Mu comes right before the word that is "inverted".

There are no restrictions.

Mu is abbreviated: OPP

Examples: Nan tsho mu nan.
 * To give and take.

Nan tsho mu  nan. Give and OPP give 'To give and take.'

Shakai sa maku saw yabok tai.
 * The cat is in the front of the tree.

Shakai sa   maku saw   yabok tai. Cat   c.OBJ tree c.GEN front c.LOC 'The cat is in the front of the tree.'

Shakai sa maku saw mu yabok tai.
 * The cat is behind the tree.

Shakai sa   maku saw   mu  yabok tai. Cat   c.OBJ tree c.GEN OPP front c.LOC 'The cat is behind the tree.'

=Parallels with "Soo"=

Soo can be used to express "the more the better"-kind of formulations. This shall be explained here.

The formula is: soo soo.

The two (or more) parts followed by the soo exist in a conditional relation.

Soo can be translated as 'as much'.

Example: Ley bu bà na hoana soo ley sa bà maŋal soo.
 * The more you laugh, the more beautiful you are.

Ley bu   bà   na     hoana soo     ley sa    bà   maŋal     soo. You c.ERG much c.QUAN laugh as_much you c.OBJ much beautiful as_much 'The more you laugh, the more beautiful you are.'

Ley sa bà na ata bulu soo ley sa bà na elena nan.
 * The more friends you have, the more presents you get.

Ley sa   bà   na     ata    bulu  soo     bà   na     elena   bokéo   soo. You c.OBJ much amount friend c.SOC as_much much amount present receive as_much 'The more friends you have, the more presents you get.'

=Expressing Possession=

There are many basic kinds of possession. One is to own or to be responsible for something, the other is to have something at your disposal. Other uses include expressing affiliation or availability.

The particle saw
The particle saw is used to express both ownership and responsibility and affiliation.

Example: Kali sa lou saw ata.
 * This is my friend.

Kali sa   lou saw   ata. This c.OBJ I  c.GEN friend 'This is my friend.'

Lemba sa wen saw dshitàni saw ìu.
 * She is responsible for that part of the garden.

Lemba sa   wen saw   dshitàni saw   ìu. That c.OBJ she c.GEN garden   c.GEN part 'She is responsible for that part of the garden.'

Saying "I have"
To express availability of something, the sociative particle bulu is used. It corresponds to the english "I have", though literally it means "to be with something".

Example: Lou sa maŋal ka madada bulu.
 * I have a nice family. (I'm with a nice family.)

Lou sa   maŋal ka     madada bulu. I  c.OBJ nice  c.QUAL family c.SOC 'I have a nice family.'

Lou sa bilà nal bulu.
 * I have enough money(gold). (I'm with enough money.)

Lou sa   bilà   nal   bulu. I  c.OBJ enough money c.SOC 'I have enough money.'

=Dialogue=

Tom: Hello! Anna: Hello. How are you? Tom: I'm fine, and you? Anna: Me too, tell me, where have you been? What have you been doing? Tom: Err, I was climbing mountains and then i went for a walk in the forest. Anna: Were you alone all the time? Tom: No! Not at all! There were many animals who allowed me to stay. I love animals. Anna: Wow! Will you do it again? Tom: Definitely. Do you want to come with me? We could go to the ocean, too. Anna: Yes, let's go together. Tom: Okay, I'm looking forward to it. Good bye. Anna: Yes, Good bye.

Translation

Tom: Elena la. Anna: Elena la. Nui kamta no. Tom: Maŋal kamta. Ley sa no. Anna: Tsho lou. Ley bu tuba mo ja nui tai mi. Nui ama mi no. Tom: Aa, lima sa lagùn mi tsho simyóu tai midewa mi. Anna: Bo we amun no. Tom:  Si. Sàbo ìu. Ba waŋit emyu sa mi tsho mu ìa ja lou bu diebu. Emyu sa hiwo. Anna: Maŋal. Nane ama lia no. Tom: Alùt. Lou bulu midewa liwa no. Sawi lou bu tsho kuu enà midewa lia. Anna: Dio. Bulu etò midewa m. Tom: Maŋal. Bikàmi. Kana sa tadshìa. Elena mi. Anna: Dio. Elena mi.

=Stress=

There are several rules concerning stress. They all follow the same logic.

Word Chains
If there is a word chain, the stress is always on the base word.

Reduplication
Reduplication is just another form of word chain, so the same rule can be applied. Always stress the base word.

tam tam (bold is stressed)

Questions
Questions follow the same rules as other sentences. As for tone, there should be no difference compared to a normal sentence. That means, the voice stays low in the end of a question as well.

Yes/No-Questions
There are no special rules regarding Yes/No-Questions.

Nui-Questions
In a Nui-Question, intonation is the same, but there is a stress on the nui

Arbitrary Stress
In every sentence, the speaker is free to put a stress on any word, if it helps conveying his or her intent.

=Example Sentences=

Vocabulary
Here is a vocabulary list with all the words that appear in the examples.

=Text=

Basawi ubeyo tsho neyma bu ambana mi ja nui nuru sa bà dshulo. Midewa may bu bà lum o bwi bulu dsha bawa mi we. Mesha bu mu ìa mi ja midewa may sawa o bwi sa samiku kaŋu asàl ye nuru sa bà dshulo. Tsho basawi ubeyo bu nay nam dshulo ka kupìgwa mi ee bà dshulo ka kupìgwa mi soo midewa may bu o bwi sa bà bambu ama soo. Tsho hitu we basawi ubeyo bu dshàlibu sa shwe mi. Tsho neyma bu bà lum ka ukiŋi ama mi tsho simaŋu etò midewa may bu o bwi sa samiku mi. Basawi obeyo bu dodshoma mi mo ja neyma sa bà dshulo mi.

= Notes =

Awkaŋu is basically already complete, but I didn't want to explain every grammar detail here or give all the words that exist. If someone is interested, I will clarify anything that is not clear. Any questions are welcome!

--Seladwa 11:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Siah

--Seladwa 20:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Siah

--Seladwa 19:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Siah

--Seladwa 22:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Siah