I'd actually recommend you learn doing it in source. I mean, the "complex code" thing is something really hard to track down, so you might check history, but source editing can both let you make pages better, smaller and, when you get skilled enough, easier.

This is very true, it's just sometimes quite annoying. Also, what I find strange is that not five minutes after I first posted about this problem, I was able to edit it again using the visual editor and now all of a sudden it doesn't work anymore. :/ haha

Yeah, Wikia's a bit hipsterish on that one: sometimes it decides it's nice to let you edit in rich text mode, sometimes it decides it isn't :D

I left my rich text editor permanently off for that reason.
Come to the dark side of the Force - we have prettier templates ;,,,;

Hahah I think I shall do so! 

Speaking of templates, how do I get the red to change to green in the definition template? I have 

...

|NounCase   = Yes

|NounNumber = Yes

|NounDefiniteness = Yes

|NounGender = Yes

|VerbVoice  = Yes

|VerbMood   = Yes

|VerbPerson = Yes

|VerbNumber = Yes

|VerbTense  = Yes

|VerbAspect = Yes}}

but they are all still red and I have seen some other languages that have that these sections in green. Is 'yes' the wrong answer?  :P Or would it be possible to add in a background colour code or how does it work? I have tried over and over to get this right but I'm not managing. 

Try lowercase :]

hahah omw! really?! Thank you :D

No probs :D

If you ever have any other wiki problems, come look for me :]

¡Muchas gracias! Lo haceré :)

So there isn't a way to switch back to rich text editing? I'm having trouble with Zvretulin.

Gibberish, it's working fine for me. What exactly is it doing?