What do you think of conlangs (that are not jokelangs) that don't use the IPA to define their phonology? I don't like them, because using such a system is inconsistent, and also, some people don't know to imitate accents!
ALL POSTS
Same
1
It's a sign of being new to the craft. A common pitfall is saying something like "pronounced like the 'a' in man" when that could mean [a], [æ] or [ɛə]. But be nice, because we were all new once.
I don't mind it, because some people might 1: not understand how IPA works or 2: not have discovered IPA yet.
Why being mean to new conlangers huh?!
@The Great Otter I just don't like it when phonologies of conlangs are described without the IPA, I'm not being mean to new conlangers, just saying my opinion
@Ralsei floof Yea, so, if you are new to conlanging, and haven't learned the IPA yet, then just learn it before making your first conlang
@Beltonia yea, it just irritates me for some reason, a pet peeve if you will
What do you think?